ASP.Net,
the server-side Web application framework, which is exclusively
designed for Web development as well as production of dynamic Web pages,
has gained a lot of popularity of late. However, the framework is not
absolutely without the blues. There are a lot of factors that keep on
cropping up while using ASP. NET and these factors can well be stated as
pitfalls of ASP.NET. Hence, it is necessary to be well informed about
these disadvantages as that will help the developers in the long run.
Let us discuss some of these drawbacks.
Cost
A
standard .NET development team comprising of three to four developers
requires a comprehensive setup along with licensed version of all the
major server-side software packages to run things efficiently.
Naturally, it will involve a fair amount of cost and hence, companies
which have just started operating with a shoestring budget many at times
do not find putting up an ASP.Net set up due to financial constraints.
However, one can control the financial problems by using certain
development tools that come free of cost. Some of these tools include C#
compiler.
Restricted control over HTML
The
outputs from HTML generally do not succeed in complying with the web
standards or when it comes to making a formidable use of CSS or
Cascading Style Sheets. Server controls also generate unpredictable as
well as complex values of ID, which are hard to access by using
JavaScript.
This application framework brings in a huge amount of data in ‘view’ state, thus frustrating the site visitors to a large extent. Besides, this phenomenon also results in slower and lazy response time along with increasing the bandwidth demand of a particular server.
Leaky Abstraction
Web forms have a tendency of hiding HTML
and HTTP whenever it is possible. As and when the users try to
implement various customized behaviors, they quite often result in
considerable abstraction, and this forces the users into using more
traditional post track methods when generating a desired HTML.
Limited Testing Support
The
firmly coupled or paired architecture of this application framework is
considered unsuitable when it comes to unit testing as well as
integration testing.
An extremely complicated page life cycle
Besides, though the page life cycles of this application are well documented, the presence of too many events makes it extremely hard for the developers to spot out the exact place and process of implementing the codes.
It is not suitable for web RAD
ASP.Net
is an extraordinary platform for Windows application development.
Still, it tends to lack in terms of competence while making the web
behave like WinForms. For users who are looking to web-enable their .NET
based clients or applications ASP.Net is the best answer. Again, for
those who are designing a prototype of any social networking site, the
framework is just like a curse. It simply doesn’t work.
Apart
from all these issues, the ASP application framework is often plagued
by other relatively less important or minor issues like when the users
click on the ‘back’ button of the browser, it might not every time take
them back to the earlier stage or level. Also, updates on the dynamic
pages can at times cause a substantial amount of trouble for the users,
especially while bookmarking a particular application state.
In
spite of all these shortcomings, the application framework enjoys a
considerable extent of popularity amongst the developers and
programmers, due to its amazing capacity of encapsulating the markups of
a page or a part of it and rendering it successfully in a dynamic way.
You can get in touch with a custom .net development company who can help you develop web apps that are stable, scalable and secure.
We provide dot net application development services. If you would like to hire dot net programmers for your development needs, please contact us Mindfire Solutions.
No comments:
Post a Comment